Tuesday, 7 May 2013

माताजी, आप बैठो।

बस रुकी तो एक बुढ़िया बस में चढ़ी। सीट
खाली न पाकर वह आगे ही खड़ी हो गयी।
बस झटके के साथ चली तो वह लड़खड़ाकर गिर पड़ी। सीटों पर बैठे लोगों ने उसे गिरते हुए देखा। जब तक कोई उठकर उसे उठाता, वह उठी और पास की एक सीट को कसकर पकड़कर खड़ी हो गई।
जिस सीट के पास वह खड़ी थी, उस पर बैठे पुरुष ने उसे बस में चढ़ते, अपने पास
खड़ा होते और गिरते देखा था। लेकिन अन्य बैठी सवारियों की भाँति वह
भी चुप्पी साधे बैठा रहा।
अब बुढ़िया मन ही मन बड़बड़ा रही थी--
कैसा जमाना आ गया है! बूढ़े लोगों पर
भी लोग तरस नहीं खाते। इसे देखो, कैसे
पसरकर बैठा है। शर्म नहीं आती, एक
बूढ़ी-लाचार औरत पास में खड़ी है, लेकिन
मजाल है कि कह दे, आओ माताजी, यहाँ बैठ जाओ...।
तभी, उसके मन ने कहा-- क्यों कुढ़
रही है ?... क्या मालूम यह बीमार हो ?
अपाहिज हो ? इसका सीट पर
बैठना ज़रूरी हो। इतना सोचते ही वह
अपनी तकलीफ़ भूल गयी। लेकिन, मन
था कि वह कुछ देर बाद फिर कुढ़ने लगी--
क्या बस में बैठी सभी सवारियाँ बीमार-
अपाहिज हैं ?... दया-तरस नाम की तो कोई चीज रही ही नहीं।
इधर जब से वह बुढ़िया बस में चढ़ी थी,
पास में बैठे पुरुष के अन्दर भी घमासान
मचा हुआ था। बुढ़िया पर उसे दया आ
रही थी। वह उसे सीट देने की सोच
रहा था, पर मन था कि वहाँ से दूसरी ही आवाज निकलती-- क्यों उठ जाऊँ? सीट पाने के लिए तो वह एक स्टॉप पीछे से बस में चढ़ा है। सफ़र भी कोई छोटा नहीं है। पूरा सफ़र खड़े होकर यात्रा करना कितना कष्टप्रद है। और फिर, दूसरे भी तो देख रहे हैं, वे क्यों नहीं इस बुढ़िया को सीट दे देते?
इधर, बुढ़िया की कुढ़न जारी थी और उधर
पुरुष के भीतर का द्वंद्व। उसके लिए सीट
पर बैठना कठिन हो रहा था--
क्या पता बेचारी बीमार हो?.. शरीर में
तो जान ही दिखाई नहीं देती।
हड्डियों का पिंजर। न जाने कहाँ तक
जाना है बेचारी को ! तो क्या हुआ ?.. न,
न ! तुझे सीट से उठने की कोई ज़रूरत नहीं।
--माताजी, आप बैठो। आखिर वह उठ
खड़ा हुआ। बुढ़िया ने पहले कुछ सोचा, फिर सीट पर सिकुड़कर बैठते हुए बोली-- तू भी आ जा पुत्तर, बैठ जा मेरे संग। थक
जाएगा खड़े-खड़े।

My life

When I look back on my life, I see pain, mistakes and heartache. When I look in the mirror, I see strength, learned lessons, and pride in myself.

Awesome Lines.!

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Delhi gang-rape victim Nirbhaya scores 73% in last exam of her life

DEHRADUN: It will never be known if Nirbhaya would have been happy with these marks, but the varsity where she was studying physiotherapy revealed on Wednesday that she secured a first division with 73% in the last exam of her life.

"Nirbhaya got better marks than most as the average is around 55 to 65%," said an emotional Harish Arora, head of Sai Institute in Dehradun where the 23-year-old girl was enrolled for the four-year course. Some other teachers who taught her said her scores were "excellent".

Nirbhaya, who was gang-raped in Delhi on December 16 and died of injuries sustained in the brutal attack on December 29, had a total of 800 out of 1100 marks in six papers in tests conducted last year by HNB Garhwal University (a central varsity). It was after this that she had left for Delhi for an internship in a Delhi hospital in the first week of December.

When TOI broke the news to Nirbhaya's parents in New Delhi, they were initially at a loss for words. Then, after a brief silence, her father said, "The result is good. But the happiness that should be there is overshadowed by our sadness. I can only hope that my two other children are inspired by this to take the same path."

Giving details of her performance, Arora said Nirbhaya got 124 out of 200 in physiotherapy orthopedics; 147 out of 200 in physiotherapy neurology; 151 out of 200 in physiotherapy cardiology; 144 out of 200 in physiotherapy medicine; 74 out of 100 in physiotherapy biostatics, and 160 out of 200 in clinical project.

"This clearly indicates she was a very hardworking student," said a teacher who didn't want to be named. "She was serious about a career in physiotherapy."

Sai Institute also announced they would hand over a cheque of Rs 1,80,000 to Nirbhaya's family in keeping with a decision the management took to return the girl's entire 4-year course fee. "The money will be given to a family member (of Nirbhaya) at a function that will be held at Dehradun's Parade Ground to pay tribute to her," Arora said. "I am sure someone will land up to accept the amount. In case they decline, saying the money can be used to help women students from poor families, we will do that too."

Delhi gang-rape victim Nirbhaya scores 73% in last exam of her life

DEHRADUN: It will never be known if Nirbhaya would have been happy with these marks, but the varsity where she was studying physiotherapy revealed on Wednesday that she secured a first division with 73% in the last exam of her life.

"Nirbhaya got better marks than most as the average is around 55 to 65%," said an emotional Harish Arora, head of Sai Institute in Dehradun where the 23-year-old girl was enrolled for the four-year course. Some other teachers who taught her said her scores were "excellent".

Nirbhaya, who was gang-raped in Delhi on December 16 and died of injuries sustained in the brutal attack on December 29, had a total of 800 out of 1100 marks in six papers in tests conducted last year by HNB Garhwal University (a central varsity). It was after this that she had left for Delhi for an internship in a Delhi hospital in the first week of December.

When TOI broke the news to Nirbhaya's parents in New Delhi, they were initially at a loss for words. Then, after a brief silence, her father said, "The result is good. But the happiness that should be there is overshadowed by our sadness. I can only hope that my two other children are inspired by this to take the same path."

Giving details of her performance, Arora said Nirbhaya got 124 out of 200 in physiotherapy orthopedics; 147 out of 200 in physiotherapy neurology; 151 out of 200 in physiotherapy cardiology; 144 out of 200 in physiotherapy medicine; 74 out of 100 in physiotherapy biostatics, and 160 out of 200 in clinical project.

"This clearly indicates she was a very hardworking student," said a teacher who didn't want to be named. "She was serious about a career in physiotherapy."

Sai Institute also announced they would hand over a cheque of Rs 1,80,000 to Nirbhaya's family in keeping with a decision the management took to return the girl's entire 4-year course fee. "The money will be given to a family member (of Nirbhaya) at a function that will be held at Dehradun's Parade Ground to pay tribute to her," Arora said. "I am sure someone will land up to accept the amount. In case they decline, saying the money can be used to help women students from poor families, we will do that too."

देखें कब कौन बना बीजेपी का राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष BJP President, Who and When..!!



भारतीय जनता पार्टी (बीजेपी) के नए अध्यक्ष के रूप में राजनाथ सिंह पर मुहर लग गई है. राजनाथ सिंह दूसरी बार बीजेपी के अध्यक्ष बने हैं. राजनीतिक पार्टी बीजेपी की स्थापना 6 अप्रैल 1980 में हुई. आइये जानते हैं स्थापना के बाद से अब तक कौन कौन बना है बीजेपी का अध्यक्ष...
बीजेपी अध्यक्षकार्यकाल
अटल बिहारी वाजपेयी1980 से 1986
लालकृष्ण आडवाणी1986 से 1991
मुरली मनोहर जोशी1991 से 1993
लालकृष्ण आडवाणी1993 से 1998
कुशाभाऊ ठाकरे1998 से 2000
बंगारू लक्ष्मण2000 से 2001
जेना कृष्णमूर्ति2001 से 2002
वेंकैया नायडु2002 से 2004
लालकृष्ण आडवाणी2004 से 2006
राजनाथ सिंह2006 से 2009
नितिन गडकरी2009 से 2013
राजनाथ सिंह23 जनवरी 2013 से आगे


और भी...

Jenna Lyons, the Woman Who Dresses America

IT’S hard to miss Jenna Lyons. About nine feet tall and slim as a mink, often eccentrically dressed and wearing the boxy, geek-chic eyewear that has become the most identifiable signature in fashion since Anna Wintour’s bob, the 44-year-old executive creative director of J. Crew was an instantly recognizable presence at the many parties, runway shows and red carpet events she attended during 2012.



There she was at the Costume Institute gala in May, dressed in a blue-collarish denim jacket with a formal duchesse silk skirt in Schiaparelli pink. There she was during Fashion Week, dancing away at the Alexander Wang after-party, her shirt unbuttoned down to the Netherlands. There she was at the CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund dinner in early November, in a matching silver paisley top and pants reminiscent of 1950s men’s pajamas, huddled for much of the evening with Seth Meyers of “Saturday Night Live.” And there she was on Nov. 12 on the stage of Carnegie Hall, where, along with notables like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the architect Zaha Hadid and five Olympic gold-winning athletes, she was named one of Glamour magazine’s Women of the Year.
As she stood on stage in a man’s tuxedo shirt, form-fitting black pants and emerald-and-diamond chandelier earrings from Bulgari, grasping the unwieldy award that had been presented to her by Lauren Hutton, Ms. Lyons spoke movingly of her long path from storklike teenager to fashion swan. “I know what it’s like not to feel beautiful,” she told the audience, which included hundreds of young girls invited by the magazine. “I remember that feeling.”
There was another moment of significance in the speech, at least for those in the fashion world who had been buzzing about Ms. Lyons’s private life for the last year: when she made eye contact with an attractive young woman sitting about a dozen rows from the stage and thanked, along with her young son and her boss, “Courtney, who has shown me new love.”
Like Jodie Foster’s coming-out (sort of) speech at the Golden Globes last Sunday, Ms. Lyons’s acceptance speech was a public acknowledgment of her relationship with Courtney Crangi, the sister and business partner of the jeweler Philip Crangi, and the woman whom she starting dating after separating from her husband of nine years, the artist Vincent Mazeau. The couple’s breakup at the end of 2011 and the subsequent romance had been avidly covered by The New York Post, People magazine and hordes of fashion bloggers, but Ms. Lyons had stayed mum on the subject until that night.
Jenna Lyons Comes Out?” read the headline on The Huffington Post the next morning. “Did J. Crew Style Guru Jenna Lyons Just Come Out of the Closet?” asked Jezebel. “Jenna Lyons Thanks Her Son and Girlfriend in Inspiring Acceptance Speech,” announced Fashionista.
Scrutiny on a gossip site is rarely welcome, but there is no denying that Ms. Lyons’s growing celebrity has been good for her and J. Crew, whether she is quoted in the press when Michelle Obama appears at a public event dressed in J. Crew, or she is lending her face and style to the hugely popular “Jenna’s Picks” feature in the J. Crew catalog and on its Web site. From time to time, the company has even winked at her growing status as a style icon, as when, at the fall presentation, a long line of models were decked out in those signature eyeglasses, or when the catalog showed Ms. Lyons painting her son’s toenails hot pink.
But with fame came a level of intrusiveness, and paparazzi interest that Ms. Lyons was not prepared for. Page Six exhaustively covered the breakup with her husband and the emotionally fraught sale of their Park Slope town house (which sold in February to Vincent Martin of Depeche Mode for $4 million). A Fox News commentator pronounced the toenail-painting no less than “an attack on masculinity.” “It may be fun and games now, Jenna,” Keith Ablow wrote on the Fox Web site, “but at least put some money aside for psychotherapy for the kid — and maybe a little for others who’ll be affected by your ‘innocent’ pleasure.” (On “The Daily Show,” Jon Stewart mocked the hullabaloo with a segment he called “Toemageddon.”)
Ms. Lyons concedes that she is not immune to the joys that fame has brought her. “Do I like the attention?” she said over drinks at Locanda Verde, around the corner from the TriBeCa loft where she lives with her 6-year-old son, Beckett. “Well, of course the narcissist in me will say ‘Yes.’ In all honesty, there is nothing more sweet and moving than when someone comes up to me and says: ‘You’re Jenna Lyons, aren’t you? I love J. Crew.’ That is so nice. I love that. It is amazing.”
But, as with the Page Six dissection of her love life, not all publicity is welcome publicity.
“It has been challenging this past year,” she said dryly. “I’ve been sort of shocked with the level of interest in my personal life.” Traveling under the radar of the paparazzi, it seems, is increasingly not an option.
“I keep my sunglasses on,” she said. “Too bad I’m six feet tall.”
Millard S. Drexler, J. Crew’s chief executive and Ms. Lyons’s mentor at the company (“She is, in my opinion, one of the most talented, trained, intuitive and commercial designers I have ever met”), sees something of an upside to the challenges Ms. Lyons has had to face.
“She went through this public period that was, let’s call it, maybe slightly scandalous,” he said. “And I think that made her, in a perverse way, very appealing, because who in the world doesn’t deal with issues? I saw her grow dramatically from having suffered that adversity — grow in her own confidence, in her own appeal. And it wasn’t like she hired a bunch of public relations people to cover anything over. She handled it with a great amount of dignity.”
DECEMBER was the 22nd anniversary of Jenna Lyons’s arrival at J. Crew — she has spent exactly half her life there. She started as an assistant designer in men’s wear, fresh out of Parsons, and over the next two decades worked her way to the top. Now, as the company’s president, she oversees every visible part of the company, from the clothes themselves to the look of the stores, the catalogs and the Web site. One might call her today’s answer to Tom Ford, who almost two decades ago undertook the reinvention of another swamped brand, Gucci.
Ms. Lyons is like Tom Ford in many ways: articulate, intelligent, charismatic, controlling and very talented. But she is also the anti-Tom Ford. Mr. Ford, a former model, courted fame with a cool, almost macho sense of self-assurance. By contrast, Ms. Lyons is down-to-earth, approachable and almost comically self-effacing. And whereas Mr. Ford was fastidious about his public image, from his uniform of a dark, unbuttoned dress shirt and flat-front trousers to the angle from which he could be photographed, Ms. Lyons is surprisingly unconcerned about how she is seen and depicted. She takes chances with different looks (though almost everything she wears is from J. Crew). She has fun getting dressed. She makes mistakes and laughs at herself.
“Jenna is remarkably astute and intelligent, and she’s open about herself,” said Mark Holgate, the fashion news director of Vogue, who used to live in the garden apartment of Ms. Lyons’s Park Slope town house and who has worked with her on the CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund. (He also introduced her to Ms. Crangi.) “Nothing ever feels forced or contrived or rehearsed with her,” he said. “There’s a kind of vulnerability and unguardedness that is rare in that level of designer.”
That is no understatement. Ms. Lyons does indeed come across as her unvarnished self, whether she is squealing with delight over a sparkly bit of jewelry or crisply reeling off the elements, ideas and merits of a new collection in a business meeting.
When it is suggested that she could be described as equal parts fashion insider and outsider, she scoffed.
“I am totally an outsider,” she said. “I am so not an insider, and that is O.K. I might feel like one in very particular moments. But I don’t feel the same pressure I did when I was young to be part of the club. I’m not one of the cool kids, and that is totally fine.”
THAT sensibility springs from sensitivity. Ms. Lyons grew up in Palos Verdes, Calif., on the coast south of Los Angeles. She was not Malibu Barbie. Her awkward height was compounded by a genetic disorder, incontinentia pigmenti, that scarred her skin and caused her hair to fall out in patches and her teeth to be malformed. (She has worn dentures ever since, she freely pointed out.)
Then, in her seventh grade home economics class, she learned how to sew, and sew she did. It worked better than she could have hoped. The popular girls liked what she made. Style gave her not only armor; it gave her cachet.




Obama Offers Liberal Vision: ‘We Must Act’



WASHINGTON — Barack Hussein Obama ceremonially opened his second term on Monday with an assertive Inaugural Address that offered a robust articulation of modern liberalism in America, arguing that “preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action.”

On a day that echoed with refrains from the civil rights era and tributes to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Mr. Obama dispensed with the post-partisan appeals of four years ago to lay out a forceful vision of advancing gay rights, showing more tolerance toward illegal immigrants, preserving the social welfare safety net and acting to stop climate change.
At times he used his speech, delivered from the West Front of the Capitol, to reprise arguments from the fall campaign, rebutting the notion expressed by conservative opponents that America risks becoming “a nation of takers” and extolling the value of proactive government in society. Instead of declaring the end of “petty grievances,” as he did taking the oath as the 44th president in 2009, he challenged Republicans to step back from their staunch opposition to his agenda.
“Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-old debates about the role of government for all time — but it does require us to act in our time,” he said in the 18-minute address. “For now decisions are upon us, and we cannot afford delay. We cannot mistake absolutism for principle or substitute spectacle for politics or treat name-calling as reasoned debate. We must act.”
Mr. Obama used Abraham Lincoln’s Bible, as he did four years ago, but this time added Dr. King’s Bible as well to mark the holiday honoring the civil rights leader. He became the first president ever to mention the word “gay” in an Inaugural Address as he equated the drive for same-sex marriage to the quests for racial and gender equality.
The festivities at the Capitol came a day after Mr. Obama officially took the oath in a quiet ceremony with his family at the White House on the date set by the Constitution. With Inauguration Day falling on a Sunday, the swearing-in was then repeated for an energized mass audience a day later, accompanied by the pomp and parade that typically surround the quadrennial tradition.
Hundreds of thousands of people gathered on a brisk but bright day, a huge crowd by any measure, though far less than the record turnout four years ago. If the day felt restrained compared with the historic mood the last time, it reflected a more restrained moment in the life of the country. The hopes and expectations that loomed so large with Mr. Obama’s taking the office in 2009, even amid economic crisis, have long since faded into a starker sense of the limits of his presidency.
Now 51 and noticeably grayer, Mr. Obama appeared alternately upbeat and reflective. When he re-entered the Capitol at the conclusion of the ceremony, he stopped his entourage to turn back toward the cheering crowds on the National Mall.
“I want to take a look, one more time,” he said. “I’m not going to see this again.”
If the president was wistful, his message was firm. He largely eschewed foreign policy except to recommend engagement over war, and instead focused on addressing poverty and injustice at home. He did little to adopt the language of the opposition, as he has done at moments in the past, and instead directly confronted conservative philosophy.
“The commitments we make to each other — through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security — these things do not sap our initiative; they strengthen us,” he said. “They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.”
The phrase, “nation of takers,” was a direct rebuke to Republicans like Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, last year’s vice-presidential nominee, and several opposition lawmakers took umbrage at the president’s tone.
“I would have liked to see a little more on outreach and working together,” said Senator John McCain of Arizona, the Republican who lost to Mr. Obama four years ago. “There was not, as I’ve seen in other inaugural speeches, ‘I want to work with my colleagues.’ ”
Representative Pete Sessions of Texas, a member of the Republican leadership, said that from the opening prayer to the closing benediction, “It was apparent our country’s in chaos and what our great president has brought us is upheaval.” He added, “We’re now managing America’s demise, not America’s great future.”



Mr. Obama struck a more conciliatory note during an unscripted toast during lunch with Congressional leaders in Statuary Hall after the ceremony. “Regardless of our political persuasions and perspectives, I know that all of us serve because we believe that we can make America for future generations,” he said.
For the nation’s 57th presidential inauguration, a broad section of downtown Washington was off limits to vehicles and a major bridge across the Potomac River was closed to regular traffic as military Humvees were stationed at strategic locations around the city.
Joining the president through the long day were the first lady, Michelle Obama, and their daughters, Malia, 14, and Sasha, 11. The young girls were playful. Malia at one point sneaked up behind her father and cried out, “Boo!” Sasha used a smartphone to take a picture of her parents kissing in the reviewing stand, then made them do it again. Both girls bounced with the martial music at the Capitol.
Mr. Obama’s day began with a service at St. John’s Episcopal Church, across Lafayette Square from the White House, where the Rev. Andy Stanley told him to “leverage that power for the benefit of other people in the room.” At the Capitol, Myrlie Evers-Williams, the civil rights leader, delivered the invocation and the Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir performed the “Battle Hymn of the Republic.”
Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was sworn in at 11:46 a.m. by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The singer James Taylor then performed “America the Beautiful.”
At 11:50 a.m., Mr. Obama was sworn in again by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. After the two mangled the 35-word oath four years ago, necessitating a just-in-case do-over the next day, the president and chief justice this time carefully recited the words in tandem without error, although Mr. Obama did swallow the word “states.”
Mr. Obama was more specific in discussing policy than presidents typically are in an Inaugural Address. Particularly noticeable was his recommitment to fighting climate change. “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” he said.
He referred only implicitly to terrorism, the issue that has so consumed the nation for the past decade, but offered a more inward-looking approach to foreign policy, saying that “enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war.” He also talked of overhauling immigration rules so “bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our work force, rather than expelled from our country.”
For a president who opposed same-sex marriage as recently as nine months ago, the speech was a clear call for gay rights, as he noted the journey “through Seneca Falls and Selma and Stonewall,” symbolically linking seminal moments in the struggles for equal rights for women, blacks and gay men and lesbians.
“Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well,” he said.
The expanse between the Capitol and the Washington Monument was filled with supporters, many of them African-Americans attending only the second inauguration of a black president. As large TV screens flickered in and out and the audio often warbled, the ceremony was difficult to follow for many braving the Washington chill.
The speech was followed by song, poem and benediction from Kelly Clarkson, Richard Blanco, the Rev. Luis Leon and Beyoncé. The president and first lady got out of their motorcade twice to walk stretches along Pennsylvania Avenue. Mr. Biden and Jill Biden did as well, and the vice president greeted bystanders with fist-pumping gusto.
The two families then settled into the specially built bulletproof reviewing stand to watch the parade. Mr. Obama, who often uses Nicorette to tame an old smoking habit, was spotted chewing as the bands marched past.
In the evening, the Obamas attended two official inaugural balls, down from 10 four years ago. The president, in tuxedo with white tie, danced at each of them with the first lady, in a custom Jason Wu ruby chiffon and velvet gown, to Al Green’s “Let’s Stay Together,” performed by Jennifer Hudson. The Obamas were back at the White House by 10:15 p.m.

NYTIMES

A Revamped Myspace Site Faces a Problem With Rights

Last week, Justin Timberlake’s new song, “Suit & Tie,” did double promotional duty. Not only was it a teaser for Mr. Timberlake’s latest album, but it also served as an introduction for a revamped version of Myspace, the once-mighty social network and music site.

Mr. Timberlake is a minority partner in the investor group that bought Myspace for $35 million in 2011, six years after News Corporation paid $580 million for it with hopes of dominating the social Web. Before long it was eclipsed by Facebook and fell into the dustbin of the Internet.
The new Myspace, which like the old MySpace lets people listen to huge numbers of songs free, has won early praise for its sleek design. But while it has said its intention is to help artists, it may already have a problem with some of the independent record labels that supply much of its content.
Although Myspace boasts the biggest library in digital music — more than 50 million songs, it says — a group representing thousands of small labels says the service is using its members’ music without permission.
The group, Merlin, negotiates digital deals on behalf of labels around the world. Charles Caldas, chief executive of Merlin, said in an interview on Friday that its deal with Myspace expired over a year ago, yet songs from more than 100 of its labels are still available on Myspace, including Beggars Group, Domino and Merge, three of the biggest independents.
“While it’s nice that Mr. Timberlake is launching his service on this platform, and acting as an advocate for the platform,” Mr. Caldas said, “on the other hand his peers as artists are being exploited without permission and not getting remuneration for it.”
Neda Azarfar, a spokeswoman for Myspace, said the company had decided not to renew its contract with Merlin, and that if songs from its member labels were still on the site, “they were likely uploaded by users” and would be removed if requested by the label.
In December, Myspace.com had 27.4 million unique visitors in the United States, according to comScore. That is far from its peak of 76 million in 2008, but for a music industry still struggling for all the business it can get, it is an audience that cannot be ignored.
The industry as a whole is largely supportive of Myspace, which is now seen as an underdog facing long odds. For small labels, though, the licensing situation has brought back memories of the introduction of MySpace’s first music service, MySpace Music, in 2008, when deals were cut with the major labels but most independents were left out for more than a year.
“The feeling is not good,” said William Crowley, the vice president for digital and mobile at eOne Distribution, an independent music distributor that is associated with Merlin.
“Unlicensed services are a source of grave concern,” he added, “especially high-profile ones.”

NYTIMES

Obama’s Second Inaugural Speech

The following is a transcript of President Obama’s second inaugural speech. For anyone who wants something shorter, The Times has condensed the speech in a way that keeps its main themes. No words have been changed, but roughly 60 percent of the text has been removed.

MR. OBAMA: Vice President Biden, Mr. Chief Justice, Members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:
Each time we gather to inaugurate a president, we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution. We affirm the promise of our democracy. We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names. What makes us exceptional – what makes us American – is our allegiance to an idea, articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Today we continue a never-ending journey, to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured by His people here on Earth. The patriots of 1776 did not fight to replace the tyranny of a king with the privileges of a few or the rule of a mob. They gave to us a Republic, a government of, and by, and for the people, entrusting each generation to keep safe our founding creed.
For more than two hundred years, we have.
Through blood drawn by lash and blood drawn by sword, we learned that no union founded on the principles of liberty and equality could survive half-slave and half-free. We made ourselves anew, and vowed to move forward together.
Together, we determined that a modern economy requires railroads and highways to speed travel and commerce; schools and colleges to train our workers.
Together, we discovered that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play.
Together, we resolved that a great nation must care for the vulnerable, and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortune.
Through it all, we have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we succumbed to the fiction that all society’s ills can be cured through government alone. Our celebration of initiative and enterprise; our insistence on hard work and personal responsibility, these are constants in our character.
But we have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action. For the American people can no more meet the demands of today’s world by acting alone than American soldiers could have met the forces of fascism or communism with muskets and militias. No single person can train all the math and science teachers we’ll need to equip our children for the future, or build the roads and networks and research labs that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores. Now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation, and one people.
This generation of Americans has been tested by crises that steeled our resolve and proved our resilience. A decade of war is now ending. An economic recovery has begun. America’s possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands: youth and drive; diversity and openness; an endless capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention. My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment, and we will seize it – so long as we seize it together.
For we, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it. We believe that America’s prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class. We know that America thrives when every person can find independence and pride in their work; when the wages of honest labor liberate families from the brink of hardship. We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else, because she is an American, she is free, and she is equal, not just in the eyes of God but also in our own.

Is Atheism a Religion?

In Britain, where the Church of England is a laughing stock lately, the percentage of Britons professing no faith has nearly doubled in the last decade — which might explain the rise of an atheist church.
In the U.S., Susan Jacoby recently wrote, moments of tragedy can be a reminder “of what atheism has to offer.” The philosopher Gary Gutting adds that atheists, like religious people, ought to articulate reasons for their beliefs (or lack thereof).
Can atheism replace religion? Is it a religion?

The Field Hand Who Was an Artist From Midnight to 6

Robert Wilson, the director and visual artist best known for experimental theater pieces like “Einstein on the Beach,” is directing a new chamber opera at Peak Performances at Montclair State University in Montclair, N.J. “Zinnias: The Life of Clementine Hunter,” based on the life of that outsider artist, has its world premiere on Saturday and runs through Feb. 3. Hunter, a black woman who lived from 1887 to 1988, picked cotton on a Louisiana plantation and began painting in her 50s, though she never had formal training. With a libretto and music by Bernice Johnson Reagon and Toshi Reagon, and a story and book by Jacqueline Woodson, “Zinnias” also reunites Mr. Wilson with Sheryl Sutton, the performer who starred in the provocative “silent opera” “Deafman Glance,” which brought them both a lot of attention in the 1970s. Mr. Wilson and Ms. Sutton were interviewed together at Mr. Wilson’s downtown Manhattan studio; Mr. Wilson was also interviewed between rehearsals and by telephone. These are excerpts from the conversations:
Stephanie Berger
The director Robert Wilson, center, with, from left, Jennifer Nikki Kidwell, Josette Newsam-Marchak, Francesca Harper and Cornelius Bethea, rehearsing “Zinnias: The Life of Clementine Hunter.” Sheryl Sutton
Q. This opera was a commission from Peak Performances, but how did you come up with the idea of devoting a piece to the life of Clementine Hunter?
WILSON She was the first artist I ever met in my life. When I was 12 years old, I went to Natchitoches, La.; it was summer vacation with my family. We visited a plantation, Melrose. And I met an Afro-American woman who was a painter. I already had some idea of what I wanted to do in life, and one of the things that interested me was painting. But I grew up in a community [in Waco, Tex.] where there were no museums, there were no art galleries and to be an artist was something really weird. It was a very conservative Southern Baptist community. It was a disgrace that Abraham Lincoln died in a theater because a theater was a house of ill repute.
Q. What were your first impressions of Clementine Hunter?
WILSON I don’t remember what we talked about; I just knew I was very impressed with her intelligence. She had this inner power, this strength, the way she could look at you. I bought, for maybe $25, a small painting she did. The painting was of people washing clothes. I went back there when I was in high school and bought more paintings. I met a man named Francois Mignon, and I started a correspondence with him, and he sort of managed Clementine Hunter. This correspondence went on for years. I just told him things I was thinking about and what interested me. And he told me about Clementine.
Q. Compared to more experimental work like “Deafman Glance” or “Einstein on the Beach,” this is pretty straightforward. Is it a new direction?
WILSON I do so many different kinds of work. After I finish here, I do Verdi’s “Macbeth.” After that, I do “Peter Pan” with CocoRosie, these two young women from Brooklyn. I try, as much as possible, to do projects that take me to different places. One year I did William Burroughs, Tom Waits and Shakespeare. I learned loudness from working with Lou Reed. I mix things up. Here, it’s a real collaboration with Bernice and Toshi and myself. I came up with the concept.
Q. Ms. Sutton, though, does inject an unusual element. She sits silently onstage, in a chair, throughout the performance.
SUTTON My character, as usual, is undefined. But my character stands to elucidate her spiritual life. She was a painter, but she painted at night, she painted from midnight to 6 in the morning. So basically everyone knew her as a mother, a cook, a field hand. They knew her in all these worldly ways, but her real life was from midnight to 6 a.m., and she said she painted what God told her to.
WILSON To me, [Ms. Sutton’s character is] someone outside the piece. Like a witness. Like Sheryl said, you can free-associate. Almost every year I go to see a Broadway show. We went to see this show last fall, my assistant, Julian, and I. And I said to him, “Julian, just look and see how long it goes before the audience responds.” It’s never, ever longer than 25 seconds, 30 seconds. It’s all in the one-liners — you have to get it and react. This thing is different because you can get lost. And it’s O.K. to get lost.
Q. You still respect the importance of silence in creating your work?
WILSON I don’t need music, I don’t need text. I have a kind of visual book. All theater to me is dance. The staging is videotaped. People look at it, and then they write music and they write text.

In New Term, First Year Is Crucial for Obama Agenda

WASHINGTON — The Constitution may promise President Obama another four years in the White House, but political reality calls for a far shorter time frame: he has perhaps as little as a year to accomplish his big-ticket goals for a second term.
As the president begins promoting his agenda of tackling gun control, immigration and climate change, even while bracing for yet another deadline-driven fiscal debate with Republicans, his advisers are scrambling to prioritize his ambitions to avoid squandering precious time.
Tensions are already emerging between the White House and some Democrats about how much emphasis the president and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. should give their gun control measures and whether a drawn-out debate over the Second Amendment could imperil the rest of the party’s initiatives, particularly on immigration.
The mass shooting last month in Newtown, Conn., elevated gun control on the administration’s agenda, suddenly competing with plans to push for sweeping changes in the nation’s immigration laws. Faced with a choice after his re-election in 2004, President George W. Bush chose to pursue a Social Security overhaul before an immigration bill and, amid partisan rancor over the Social Security fight, ended up getting neither.
For all of the revelry surrounding the president’s second inauguration this week, Mr. Obama, his aides and Congressional allies know that their window of opportunity narrows with each passing month.
“You hope and plan for a year, with the understanding that it could be several months less or several months more,” said Robert Gibbs, the former White House press secretary and longtime adviser to Mr. Obama. “It does require having a step-by-step plan for the year because you have a finite amount of time.”
The tenor of the president’s Inaugural Address on Monday, where he delivered a forceful argument for pursuing an ambitious liberal agenda, signaled that Mr. Obama might try to approach Republicans with a sterner hand than he did in his first term. Already, he has signed executive orders on gun control and, at least for the moment, forced a Republican retreat on raising the debt ceiling.
Yet some of Mr. Obama’s most ambitious goals still require action from Congress, and Republicans still control the House. Even the Republicans’ decision to agree to an effective three-month extension on the debt ceiling creates complications, by keeping the budget fight high on the agenda.
Senator Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana, expressed the uphill climb with fiscal matters looming over the Capitol Hill, declaring: “We have to do a budget. We aren’t going to do anything of consequence here until the budget is done.”
The State of the Union address that Mr. Obama will deliver to Congress on Feb. 12 will offer the most definitive road map yet for how the White House will set priorities in his second term as well as how it intends to avoid becoming mired in a heated debate over one contentious topic to the detriment of the full agenda.
“There’s no doubt you want to get off to a strong start, and we’ve got a pretty big dance card,” said David Plouffe, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama who is leaving the White House this week. He ticked through a list of agenda items that included guns, immigration and fiscal issues, but he disputed the suggestion that one item would overtake the others.
“We clearly have this moment where we can get immigration done,” Mr. Plouffe added. “If we don’t get it done, then shame on us. We’ve got to seize this opportunity.”
The president has been studying the experiences of previous second-term administrations, aides said, including how Mr. Bush decided to put his plans to overhaul Social Security ahead of immigration in 2005. The failed fight over creating privatized Social Security accounts fractured Republicans, energized Democrats and complicated the rest of Mr. Bush’s term.
Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff to Mr. Bush for six years, said the failure to pass immigration legislation stands as a lesson to second-term presidents, including Mr. Obama, that “you can’t get everything that you want — that’s an unfortunate reality.”
The first year of a second term is about accomplishment and legacy, Mr. Card said, and should be planned carefully before the attention starts shifting away from the president.
“It is the agenda year,” Mr. Card said in an interview. “He will command attention, respect — and probably vitriol — for probably the next three years. After that, he’ll have to adjust to the klieg lights starting to shine on somebody else.”
Mr. Obama, like all presidents in their second term, will surely have to fight to stay relevant at some point, even if his advisers believe that moment is still well in the future.
The phrase “lame duck” ultimately creeps into every White House, former administration officials say, regardless of a president’s stature. A gradual slide is likely to begin after the 2014 midterm elections, the outcome of which will help shape the last two years of Mr. Obama’s presidency.
“There will be a new leader of the brand,” said Sara Taylor Fagen, the political director in the Bush administration’s second term. “And you are not going to enact major reform the year before a presidential race.”
To extend the power of the Oval Office, the president has also already signaled that he intends to try to leverage his authority more fully through executive actions that do not require Congressional approval.
He has instructed his legislative aides and the legal team in the White House Counsel’s Office to review all avenues, as he did with gun control measures last week, to pursue priorities that would otherwise be met with resistance from Republicans on Capitol Hill.
“You can’t just sit there and kind of fantasize about what would be great to do,” Mr. Plouffe said. “In a lot of these areas, there are limits.
“But I think it’s fair to say that we are going to continue to audit every idea and every possibility where we can do things on our own where Congress won’t act.”

NYTIMES

Stephens Upsets Williams in Stunner

MELBOURNE  — What was supposed to be a learning experience against one of the greatest tennis players in history turned instead into one of the bigger surprises in tennis history as the 19-year-old Sloane Stephens introduced herself to a global audience by rallying to defeat her 31-year-old American elder, Serena Williams, on Wednesday, 3-6, 7-5, 6-4.
Williams is a 15-time Grand Slam singles champion and was the No. 3 seed and a heavy favorite at the Australian Open. But what made the quarterfinal result all the more unexpected was that she has been as dominant of late as she has been at any time in the past: sweeping to the Wimbledon, Olympic and U.S. Open titles last year, then winning 20 straight matches coming into this quarterfinal.
But the streak and Williams’s newfound tranquility on court came crashing to a halt on this cool, sunlit afternoon in Rod Laver Arena as Williams — frustrated by a back problem and Stephens’s precocious blend of offense and defense — smashed her racket to smithereens early in the third set.
As a result, there will be no rematch between Williams and the world No. 1, Victoria Azarenka, in the semifinals Thursday. Instead it will be Azarenka vs. the 29th-seeded Stephens, who until this trip to Australia had never been past the fourth round in a Grand Slam tournament.
Though Stephens has had other tennis role models, including Kim Clijsters, it was a poster of Williams that once adorned her wall.
“This is so crazy, but oh my goodness,” Stephens said, wiping away tears in her post-match interview. “I think I’ll put a poster of myself now.”
It was the second Grand Slam shock of late for Williams, who was beaten in the first round of the French Open last year by the unseeded Frenchwoman Virginie Razzano. But this was the first time that Williams, the best player of her generation, had been beaten by a younger American in tournament play.
Stephens said she felt good about her chances before the match began.
“Last night I was thinking about it,” she said. “And someone asked me, ‘Do you think you can win?’ And I was like, ‘Yeah, I think so.’ But I wasn’t too clear about it, and this morning when I got up I was like, ‘Dude, you can do this. Go out and play and do your best.”’
Though Stephens grew up watching Williams from afar, they met only fairly recently. They were Fed Cup teammates last year and have spent time together in Los Angeles, where Stephens lives with her mother and younger brother and where Williams has a home.
But they will now be rivals as well as teammates, and this defeat came less than a month after they played for the first time. Williams won that match in the quarterfinals in Brisbane, Australia, in straight sets, but Stephens was surprisingly comfortable playing at Williams’s torrid baseline pace, drawing big praise from Williams in the aftermath.
Stephens looked comfortable again Wednesday, handling Williams’s power and holding her first three service games at love before Williams broke her in the eighth game and then, as expected, closed out the opening set.
Williams led 2-0 in the second set, but Stephens then began to lift her game again.
The daughter of the former National Football League running back John Stephens, who is now deceased, Stephens is one of the fastest players in women’s tennis. She tracked down groundstrokes on the run that would have been winners against most other players, and she managed to break Williams’s serve for the first time to get back to two games each.
The match took another turn in the eighth game when Williams shouted in pain as she ran forward and smacked a lunging backhand near the net. Grimacing, she was quickly broken again as Stephens took a 5-3 lead. Williams, limited in her movement, broke back in the next game and then called for a trainer on the changeover, eventually leaving the court for further treatment on her lower back.
“Well, a few days ago, it just got really tight, and I had no rotation on it,” she said. “I just went for this drop shot in the second set, and it just locked up on me. I think I couldn’t really rotate after that.”
Williams’s huge serve was considerably slower after she returned to the court, but she managed to hold at love to 5-all while serving change-ups to a visibly rattled Stephens. But the teenager fought off a break point in the next game with a forehand winner and then broke Williams for the third time in the set to even the match at one set apiece.
Williams began to swing more freely on her serve as the third set began. But with Stephens up 2-1, Williams reared back after failing to break serve and smashed her racket twice on the blue hardcourt with two massive swings, destroying the racket and then flinging it at her bench, earning a code violation for equipment abuse.

Testifying on Benghazi, Clinton Cites New Security Steps

WASHINGTON — In long-awaited testimony, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday asserted that she had moved quickly to improve the security of American diplomats after the September attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans and prompted a scathing review of State Department procedures.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday.
 
“As I have said many times since Sept. 11, I take responsibility,” Mrs. Clinton said in a prepared statement. “Nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger and more secure.”
Appearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the morning, Mrs. Clinton choked up as she recounted the grim moment in September when she and President Obama received the bodies of the four Americans killed in the Benghazi attack at Joint Base Andrews, outside Washington.
“I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews,” she said. “I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters.”
Mrs. Clinton asserted that she was never made aware of the security requests from Benghazi by Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and his subordinates. “I did not see these requests,” she said. “They did not come to me. I did not approve them. I did not deny them.”
“These requests do not normally come to the secretary of state,” she added. “They are handled by security professionals in the department.”
She insisted that the measures she was taking would ensure that requests received high-level attention in the future.
The day of testimony — Mrs. Clinton was to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in the afternoon — has major political implications for the departing secretary of state, who has been mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2016.
Mrs. Clinton was to have testified in December, but her appearance was delayed by illness and then a concussion, which led to her brief hospitalization. Republicans have been insistent that Mrs. Clinton needed to testify about her own role before leaving her State Department post, and she readily agreed.
Mrs. Clinton first publicly took responsibility for the September attack in an Oct. 15 interview with television reporters. Since then, however, she has committed herself to putting in place all of the recommendations of the independent review that was led by Thomas R. Pickering, the former American ambassador, and Mike Mullen, the retired admiral who served as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
In her prepared testimony, Mrs. Clinton sought to put the events in Benghazi in a broader regional context, noting the presence of a Qaeda-affiliated group in northern Mali.
“Benghazi didn’t happen in a vacuum,” she said. “The Arab revolutions have scrambled power dynamics and shattered security forces across the region. And instability in Mali has created an expanding safe haven for terrorists who look to extend their influence and plot further attacks of the kind we saw just last week in Algeria.”
She asserted that headway was being made on putting in place the panel’s recommendations, repeating themes that had been made to Congress by senior State Department officials last month.
“And, as I pledged in my letter to you last month, implementation has now begun on all 29 recommendations,” Mrs. Clinton said. “Our task force started by translating the recommendations into 64 specific action items. All of these action items were assigned to specific bureaus and offices, with clear timelines for completion. Fully 85 percent are on track to be completed by the end of March, with a number completed already.”
Mrs. Clinton sought to avoid the controversy over whether the attack was the work of terrorists that dogged Susan E. Rice, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, who was Mr. Obama’s initial preference to serve as Mrs. Clinton’s successor. She suggested that she was inclined to see the attack as a terrorist act from the start.
“The very next morning, I told the American people that heavily armed militants assaulted our compound and vowed to bring them to justice. And I stood with President Obama as he spoke of ‘an act of terror,'” she said.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is still led by Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, whose confirmation hearing as secretary of state is Thursday. Mr. Kerry is not leading the Wednesday hearing to avoid the perception of a conflict of interest. The hearing is being led by Senator Robert Menendez, the New Jersey Democrat, who is the incoming chairman. Mr. Kerry was not present as the hearing began.
“In all these diplomatic engagements, and in near-constant contacts at every level, we have focused on targeting Al Qaeda’s syndicate of terror – closing safe havens, cutting off finances, countering extremist ideology, and slowing the flow of new recruits,” Mrs. Clinton said. “We continue to hunt the terrorists responsible for the attacks in Benghazi and are determined to bring them to justice. And we’re also using all our diplomatic and economic tools to support the emerging democracies of the region, including Libya, to strengthen security forces and provide a path away from extremism.”

Suicide bomber kills 20 inside Iraqi Shia mosque

BAGHDAD: A suicide bomber killed at least 20 people inside a Shia Muslim mosque in northern Iraq on Wednesday after detonating his explosives in the middle of a crowded funeral ceremony.

The attack on a sensitive religious target came as Shia Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki faces pressure from mass Sunni protests that are heightening fears the OPEC country risks sliding back into widespread sectarian confrontation.

"A suicide bomber at one mosque killed and wounded tens of people. We don't know who is behind this," Amin Aziz, deputy governor of Salahuddin province, told Reuters. "We don't have a clear toll yet."

Police, who were still rescuing victims from the bomb site, said at least 20 were killed and 35 more wounded in the attack on Tuz Khurmato, a religiously and ethnically mixed city 170 km (105 miles) north of the capital Baghdad.

A year after the last American troops left the country, Sunni Islamist insurgents tied to al Qaeda still carry out major bomb attacks to stir up the kind of Shia-Sunni confrontation that killed thousands in 2006-2007.

Maliki, a Shia, is struggling to calm weeks of protests by Sunni Muslims while his fragile government, split among the Shia majority, Sunnis and ethnic Kurds, is deadlocked in a crisis over power sharing.

Justice JS Verma submits report on rape laws, 'shocked' by system's apathy

NEW DELHI: Justice JS Verma committee, set up to recommend measures to improve laws dealing with sexual offences, submitted its report to the government on Wednesday. Justice Verma said that the committee had received around 80,000 suggestions and wrapped up its work within 29 days.

Former Chief Justice of India JS Verma, the head of the three-member panel, was approached by the central government for the task on December 23. The other members of the panel are former Himachal Pradesh Chief Justice Leila Seth and former solicitor general Gopal Subramaniam.

He said the failure of governance was the root cause of crime against women. He also said it was "equally shocking" that there was total apathy of everyone who had a duty to perform.

"We have submitted the report in 29 days. When I offered to do the work within 30 days, I did not realize the magnitude of the work," Verma told a press conference after submitting his voluminous report to the home ministry.

He said the report may be known after him but it is the outcome of suggestions from people within India and outside the country.

"We received 80,000 suggestions," he said adding all of them were read and considered before finalizing the report.

On how he decided on a time frame for finalizing the report, Verma said when a senior Cabinet minister approached him on behalf of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, he asked him when is the next session of Parliament.

"The minister told me that the (Budget) session will start on February 21. There were two months. So I decided lets do it in 30 days. If we are able to do it in half the time available, then the government with its might and resources should also act fast," he said.

He complimented the youth for the mature response. "Youth has taught us what we, the older generation, were not aware of. I was struck by the peaceful manner in which the protests were carried out ... the youth rose to the occasion," he said.

Shocked to see home secretary praising commissioner

Home secretary RK Singh on Wednesday got a rap on his knuckles from Justice Verma for his praise of Delhi police commissioner Neeraj Kumar in the aftermath of the Delhi gang-rape incident, saying he was shocked to hear this when an apology was expected.

"The commissioner of police was given a pat on his back by no less than a person holding the post of home secretary. I was shocked to see that," Verma told a press conference here after submitting report on measures to improve laws dealing with sexual offences.

He said the least he would have done was to seek an apology for the failure of the duty to protect citizens and "instead of that (what did we see)".

Singh had praised Delhi Police during a press interaction days after the December 16 incident when the force arrested six men allegedly involved in the crime.

A 23-year-old girl was gang-raped in a moving bus in south Delhi allegedly by six men. The girl died on December 29 in a Singapore hospital.

Filmfare Awards 2013 Winners

Dashing and refined actor Ranbir Kapoor has once again repeated the history after winning the Best Actor award for his acclaimed film Barfi! at the 58th Idea Filmfare Awards, held in Mumbai.

The actor had previously won the 57th Idea Filmfare Awards in the same category for Rockstar movie. Not only Ranbir but actress Vidya Balan has also repeated her success just like the previous Filmfare Awards after winning the Best Actress category for Kahaani this time. Here are the other winners....


POPULAR AWARDS
Best ActorRanbir Kapoor (Barfi!)
Best ActressVidya Balan ( Kahaani)
Best FilmBarfi!
Best DirectorSujoy Ghosh (Kahaani)
Best DialogueAnurag Kashyap, Akhilesh Jaiswal, Sachin K Ladia, Zeishan Qadri (Gangs of Wasseypur)
Best ScreenplaySanjay Chouhan & Tigmanshu Dhulia (Paan Singh Tomar)
Best StoryJuhi Chaturvedi (Vicky Donor)
Best Supporting Actor (Male)Annu Kapoor (Vicky Donor)
Best Supporting Actor (Female)Anushka Sharma (Jab Tak Hai Jaan)
Best Music DirectorPritam (Barfi!)
Best LyricsGulzar (Challa), Jab Tak Hai Jaan
Best Playback (Male)Ayushmann Khurrana (Paani Da Rang) (Vicky Donor)
Best Playback (Female)Shalmali Kholgade (Pareshaan) ( Ishaqzaade)
RD Burman Award For Upcoming Talent In MusicNeeti Mohan (Jiya Re) (Jab Tak Hain Jaan)
Lifetime Achievement AwardYash Chopra
Sony Trendsetter Of The YearBarfi!
Best Debut (Male)Ayushmann Khurrana (Vicky Donor)
Best Debut (Female)Ileana D'Cruz (Barfi!)
Best Debut (Director)Gauri Shinde (English Vinglish)

CRITICS AWARDS
Critics' Award for Best Actor (Male)Irrfan Khan (Paan Singh Tomar)
Critics' Award for Best Actor (Female)Richa Chadda (Gangs of Wasseypur)
Critics' Award for Best FilmGangs of Wasseypur

FILMFARE TECHNICAL AWARDS
Best ActionSham Kaushal (Gangs Of Wasseypur)
Best CinematographySetu (Kahaani)
Best EditingNamrata Rao (Kahaani)
Best Production DesignRajat Podar (Barfi!)
Best Sound DesignSanjay Maurya & Allwin Rego (Kahaani)
Best Costume DesignManoshi Nath & Rushi Sharma ( Shanghai)
Best ChoreographyBosco-Caesar (Aunty Ji - Ek Main Aur Ekk Tu)
Best Background ScorePritam (Barfi!)

Apple's best days are behind it: Investors

NEW YORK: For many investors, Apple's best days are behind it. Competitors are catching up, they believe, and the latest iPhone is stumbling.

The company's doubters have backed their conviction with billions of dollars. Last week, the stock fell below $500 for the first time in 11 months. Since Apple's stock peaked at $705.07 on Sept. 21 -the day of the iPhone 5's release- it has fallen nearly 30 per cent, cutting Apple's market capitalization by nearly $200 billion.

Apple-still the world's most valuable public company-gets a chance to rebut the skeptics as it reports financial results for the holiday quarter. But the report could also end up confirming beliefs that the company is losing its edge as an arbiter of innovation and a pacesetter in sales growth.

Apple's perception problem centers on the iPhone. Many investors believe the company has painted itself into a corner with the high-priced gadget. The iPhone is more expensive than other smartphones that do many of the same things. The company created the modern smartphone, but because of its strategy to sell the iPhone at a large premium, it will be unable to capitalize fully as smartphones continue conquering the world. The iPhone seems destined to remain the phone of the elite who can afford it.

In many ways, the iPhone's global battle with phones running Google's Android operating system is a replay of the Mac-PC battles of the 80s and 90s, when Apple saw its innovative-yet-expensive Mac outflanked by cheaper PCs running Microsoft's DOS and Windows software.

Analyst Michael Morgan at ABI Research believes Apple's share of the global smartphone market will grow from 20.5 per cent in 2012 to 22 per cent this year and then remain flat. Meanwhile, South Korea's Samsung Electronics -the world's No. 1 maker of smartphones- is already at 30 per cent of the market, and is set to leverage its chip- and display-making capabilities into further dominance, he said.

"Barring an unlikely collapse in Samsung's business, even Apple will be chasing Samsung's technology, software, and device leadership in 2013 -through the foreseeable future," Morgan said.

Investors also see short-term difficulties for Apple. Last week, the Japanese newspaper Nikkei and The Wall Street Journal said the company has slashed its orders for iPhone 5 parts because the device isn't selling as well as hoped. Both publications cited unidentified people familiar with the situation.

Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu believes the press reports are misleading. iPhone 5 demand, he says, remains robust. He attributes the reports of lower orders to shifts to other suppliers and an improvement in production, which means fewer components are wasted while building the complicated phone.

Apple usually reports the number of iPhones it sells each quarter, so Wednesday's financial update should give investors some indication of where the company is heading. Analysts on average expect the company to show sales of 48 million iPhones, which compares with the 37 million it sold in the same period a year prior.

The wrinkle is that Apple doesn't break out how many iPhones it sells of each type - it has kept selling the cheaper, two-year-old iPhone 4 and last year's 4S alongside the flagship 5.

A key tenet among investors who remain optimistic about Apple: Although the iPhone 5 is too expensive, buyers will shift their attention to the older Apple phones, which they find "good enough."

Analyst Andy Hargreaves at Pacific Crest Securities says demand for new iPhone models is going to falter. Last week, he downgraded Apple's stock from "Outperform" to "Sector Perform" because he believes consumers aren't going to clamor for new hardware features anymore. They'll hang on to older phones longer, and when they buy, they'll buy cheaper models, he says.

This means the total dollar value of the iPhones sold in the quarter may be more indicative than the number of phones sold. Analysts expect the sales were worth $30.8 billion in the quarter, or 56 per cent of Apple's overall revenue. Deviations from this figure could cause big movements in the stock price.

There is renewed speculation that Apple could make a cheaper iPhone for the developing world, but most analysts believe the company will stick to its practice of keeping older iPhones in production and cutting their prices as new models come out. The problem is that the price cuts are relatively minor. A two-year-old iPhone 4 costs more than many new Android phones.

When reporting results for the July to September quarter three months ago, Apple shocked Wall Street by saying it expected earnings of just $11.75 per share for the October to December quarter. The company usually lowballs its estimates, but this was unusually far from the $15.59 per share average analyst estimate at the time. The reason, Apple said, was that it had so many new products coming out - including the iPhone 5 and iPad Mini - and fresh production lines are more expensive to run than mature ones.

Analysts then pulled back sharply on their estimates. Their average forecast is now $13.45 per share, according to FactSet.

In terms of sales, Apple said it expects to report about $52 billion in revenue, and analysts have wavered only slightly above that figure - they now expect sales of $54.9 billion.

While Apple's future prospects are in doubt, the company's supporters have one strong argument in their favor: the stock is cheap compared to current earnings, and even if the iPhone's sales growth slows, Apple will continue to generate plenty of revenue. The stock trades at 11 times the past 12 months of earnings, compared with 15 for Microsoft and 22 for Google. Those figures don't take into account Apple's enormous cash pile -$121 billion- which boosts its value even further.

Despite its size, Apple's stock is no stranger to corrections. In 2008, in the midst of recession, Apple's stock fell by more than half, to under $100 per share. At the time, the iPhone was a year old and hadn't revealed its full potential.

It was only in early 2012 that its market capitalization decisively outgrew that of Exxon Mobil, previously the world's most valuable company.

A smaller correction last year, also prompted by speculation about the future of the iPhone, took the stock down 16 per cent before it rebounded.

"We believe investors that can look through this noise will be rewarded in 2013," said Brian White at Topeka Capital Markets. "The negative sentiment around the stock has reached epic levels that we haven't seen in recent memory and yet we believe the product portfolio has never been stronger."

Friday, 18 January 2013

Bully, liar and cheat: Lance Armstrong admits his sins

Cycling legend Lance Armstrong's fierce defence of his record finally collapsed on Thursday as he admitted that his seven Tour de France titles were fueled by an array of drugs. "I made my decisions. They're my mistake," Armstrong told US talk show host Oprah Winfrey said, in his first interview since he was stripped of his record yellow jersey haul and banned from sport for life.

"And I'm sitting here today to acknowledge that and to say I'm sorry for that," Armstrong said. "I view this situation as one big lie that I repeated a lot of times."
"Certainly, I'm a flawed character," said Armstrong, who was once revered as a cancer survivor who beat the odds to succeed on cycling's greatest stage, then used his fame to help others fighting the disease.
"It's just this mythic, perfect story," he said. "And it wasn't true."
Winfrey's much-anticipated interview opened with a rapid-fire series of "yes" or "no" questions that saw Armstrong admit to using the blood-booster EPO, blood-doping transfusions and testosterone and human growth hormone.
He said he didn't believe that in his years of competition it was possible to win cycling's greatest races without performance enhancers.

 


Hours before the kickoff, Armstrong saw another accolade withdrawn as the International Olympic Committee said it had asked him to return the cycling time-trial bronze medal he won in 2000.
The International Cycling Union in 2012 upheld the US Anti-Doping Agency's ban of Armstrong, and the revocation of his cycling results from August 1998, but the IOC waited for three weeks to see if Armstrong planned an appeal.
"All the fault and all the blame here falls on me, but behind that picture and behind that story there's momentum, momentum," Armstrong said.
"And whether it's fans or whether it's the media ... it just gets going and I lost myself in all that," he said.
In those years, Armstrong said, he didn't even think of himself as cheating. He didn't feel he was doing something wrong.
"Scary," Armstrong said.
He admitted he bullied people who didn't go along with the "narrative" he constructed, but categorically denied forcing team-mates to dope.
He declined to characterize Italian doctor Michele Ferrari as the mastermind of the doping program on the US Postal Service cycling team.
Armstrong took issue with some points in the damning US Anti-Doping Agency report that lifted a lid on his activities, saying he didn't believe the doping program on the US Postal Service team was the biggest in the history of sport.
He said it couldn't compare to the state-sponsored doping program in the former East Germany, for example.
He also said he didn't use banned drugs when he returned from retirement in 2009, and was clean when he raced in the Tour de France in 2009 and 2010 and insisted he didn't force team-mates to be involved in doping.
"We expected guys to be fit, to be strong, to perform," Armstrong said, acknowledging that while he never issued a directive he could see that team-mates might feel pressure to follow his example.
The International Cycling Union last year upheld the US Anti-Doping Agency's ban of Armstrong, and the revocation of his cycling results from August 1998.
This includes a 2000 Olympic time-trial bronze medal officially yanked by the International Olympic Committee on Thursday.
While Winfrey confirmed on Tuesday reports that Armstrong had admitted using banned performance enhancers in their talk, little else was known of what he would reveal.
Speculation swirled as to whether he had implicated others -- notably members of the sport's world governing body -- amid allegations of complicity and cover-up.
Armstrong said he thought doping was part of the culture of cycling but added that he didn't want to accuse others.
"I didn't invent the culture, but I didn't try to stop the culture, and that's my mistake and that's what I have to be sorry for, and the sport is now paying the price because of that, and so I am sorry for that."
The difficulty of untangling the doping web in cycling was again clear when the IOC's move recalled the 2000 Olympic time-trial medallists.
Abraham Olano of Spain, who was fourth, could inherit the bronze after finishing fourth in a race won by Armstrong's ex-US Post Service team-mate Viasheslav Ekimov, with Germany's Jan Ullrich taking silver.
Ekimov is now general manager of the Katusha cycling team that were dropped from the elite ProTeam list for this season because of their ambivalent stance on doping, and Ullrich eventually served a two-year ban for doping.
Some have speculated that Armstrong might attempt to rationalize doping as standard procedure in the years of his cycling career.
Certainly his admission, and his choice of the famously sympathetic Winfrey as confessor, are an about face after years of aggressive denials and often vitriolic attacks on those who doubted him.
"No one could have imagined only a few weeks ago that Lance Armstrong would make his confession publicly, that he would confess in public to having been doped," Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme told reporters in Paris.
"It's obviously something very important but I can't say more than that ... For us, Lance Armstrong is already in the past."
This week's exercise, however, is about the future, with Armstrong reportedly seeking a way back into sports and those in cycling wondering just who will be implicated in his revelations.